During the hearing, the Chief Justice questioned the Election Commission of Pakistan's stance on the security situation and stated that it was leading to multiple questions. He also wondered what was the unique danger this time that elections cannot be held. The hearing was part of a series of pleas filed in the apex court seeking polls across the country altogether.
The hearing also touched upon the role of the parliament in election-related matters. The Chief Justice asked whether the government had given the job of the executive to the parliament or not. He also directed the Attorney General for Pakistan to read the report submitted by the Ministry of Finance on the issue of supplementary grants for the elections.
The hearing also touched upon the role of the parliament in the electoral process. Chief Justice Bandial asked the Attorney General whether the government had delegated the executive's job to the parliament or not, and Justice Akhtar questioned whether the government had ever failed to secure parliament's approval on a supplementary grant.
The Attorney General responded by stating that there was still time to seek approval for the issuance of the funds and cited Article 84 of the Constitution. However, he also noted that the National Assembly had passed a resolution against releasing the funds. The Chief Justice warned that if the funds were not provided for the elections, there could be serious consequences.
Finally, the Chief Justice questioned the Election Commission's stance on holding elections, pointing out that previous elections had been held in the midst of terrorism and political unrest. He asked what unique danger was present this time that elections could not be held, and noted that the Commission's insistence on security concerns was leading to multiple questions.
The hearing ended with the Chief Justice observing that the situation was serious and that it was necessary to ensure that elections were held in a peaceful and transparent manner. He expressed the hope that the government would take steps to provide the necessary funding and support to ensure that the electoral process was not disrupted by security concerns or other issues.
The Chief Justice of Pakistan's Supreme Court, Justice Umar Ata Bandial, has said that the court's earlier decision on the Punjab polls will not be withdrawn. During a hearing on Wednesday, the Chief Justice said that the stance of the Election Commission of Pakistan and the Defence Ministry is not enough to change the apex court's decision. The Chief Justice also said that the Ministry of Defence's request to hold elections together is "unmaintainable." The Attorney General of Pakistan requested the court for respite till negotiations are held between political parties. The Chief Justice remarked that if the political parties come together, the court can make room for them and change the date of elections, but if not, the elections will be conducted on May 14. The Supreme Court issued notices to political parties while saying that they will try to wrap up the case as soon as possible.In response to the defence ministry's plea, the CJP remarked that the request was "strange" and "unmaintainable". He questioned whether the Ministry of Defence had the authority to request the holding of elections together and suggested that the matter should be resolved through political means.
The CJP remarked that the AGP's words carried weight and that the frozen political system was starting to work. He then stated that the elections would be conducted on May 14 if the political parties did not come together, but the court could make room for them and change the date of elections if they did.
Advocate Shah Khawar also made a request to hold elections simultaneously across the country, stating that it was necessary to implement the court's decision and get people out of a state of agitation. He expressed fear that there would be a lot of problems if polls were held separately and that elected governments in the province would influence the elections.
CJP Bandial wondered why the AGP did not raise these points during the hearing and asked him who stopped him from adopting this stance. Khawar suggested that notices be issued to JI and all political parties, and the bench issued notices to the political parties while the CJP remarked that they would try to wrap up the case as soon as possible.
In conclusion, the Supreme Court of Pakistan is currently dealing with a petition filed by Advocate Shah Khawar, who is requesting that the elections be held simultaneously across the country. The court has issued notices to all political parties and directed print and electronic media to inform them to appear in court. The CJP has also suggested that the matter should be resolved through political means and has expressed hope for starting a political dialogue in the country. The court has set May 14 as the date for conducting the elections if the political parties do not come together, but it could change the date if they did The Pakistan Supreme Court is addressing Advocate Shah Khawar's petition to hold simultaneous elections across the country. In response to the Defence Ministry's plea, the Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP) criticized the request as "strange" and "unmaintainable," questioning the Ministry of Defence's authority to make such a request. The Attorney General of Pakistan (AGP) informed the court that all political parties, except for one, were willing to negotiate with the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) and trying to initiate a political dialogue. The CJP expressed hope that the political system was starting to work and that excessive security might not be necessary if things get sorted. The elections are scheduled for May 14, but the court could change the date if the political parties come together. Advocate Shah Khawar requested holding elections simultaneously, fearing problems if polls were held separately, and the court issued notices to all political parties. The CJP suggested resolving the matter through political means and hoped to wrap up the case soon.
Comments
Post a Comment